• Crypto Expert

Is the decentralization ruined if someone has outcompeted computer hash power than others?

This is another very popular question.

There are two kind of decentralized fairness: fairness of result and fairness of process. For the first one, the fairness comes from absolute fair distributed of the computer power of each country. However for the second one, everyone has the same opportunity to compete the computer power by investing money and resources.

Obviously, priority of results or process is conflict to each other. You can only choose either one of them. Bitcoin chooses the fairness of process. It doesn’t matter the result. What it matters is that even one of those three countries controlled the major hash powers, can any other one join the competition freely or not. If the competition is still open for everyone, then it is still decentralized.

Also, even for the result of some "centralization" won't destroy "decentralization" of bitcoin as the major hash power owner has no incentive to do bad things. For this part of the argument, please refer to my another article to discuss about hackers and motivations:


24 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Why do people still buy bitcoin?

The quick question is that, “Why not?” Isn’t it a cool thing to have one currency different from fiat issued from government. If don’t think so, then congratulations, you have the same thoughts as 99%

The brief history of cryptos

Bitcoin as the widely used crypto was initiated from year 2008. Bitcoins need to be “mined”by following PoW rules. From 2008 to 2013, there are many cryptos copying or modifying the codes from bitcoin

Can supercomputers mine Bitcoin?

yes but not the best option. A lot of people think mining bitcoins is competing hash power but actually it is a competition of energy efficiency. Super computers cannot compete with ASIC designed for




Thanks for submitting!